Articles / Per Law Firm's Reddit Post: Class Action Suit Filed Against Wizard's/Hasbro

Per Law Firm's Reddit Post: Class Action Suit Filed Against Wizard's/Hasbro
Discussion News 
By: CaptainJamoke - 09 May 2019
TCGPlayer Partner

Follow on
Subscribe to Youtube






Yesterday, May 8, 2019, Matt Wetherington, Esq., an attorney from the Atlanta, Georgia law firm “Werner Wetherington, P.C.” submitted a Reddit post on /r/MTGFINANCE detailing the firm’s recent class action filing against Wizards of the Coast and Hasbro. If you’ve ever seen my profile description when reading one of my deck write-ups, you’ll know that my full time job involves law practice. In this article I will attempt to provide an analysis of this potential class action lawsuit against the creators/owners of Magic the Gathering.


Throughout this article I will bold certain words such as “potential” and “alleged”. For purposes of this article, if something is potential, the meaning should be understood as something that has not yet happened, and is not certain to happen. Further, if something is alleged, the meaning should be understood to be argument not proven and only suggested.


It is important to note the above, as the subject Reddit posting was made by a firm that seeks to represent individuals in a potential lawsuit where, if successful, they would be paid from a percentage of monies received (either by Court determination or settlement).




The prospective class members:

The firm's posting states that a “class action lawsuit” was filed by them against (1) Hasbro and (2) Wizards of the Coast. There, they defined the potential members of the class as:

 1.      United States citizens;

2.      Who, “Placed an order for War of the Spark: Mythic Edition on eBay”;

3.      Who, “Received a confirmation email from eBay”;

4.      Who, “Had their order cancelled”; and

5.      Who, “Have NOT authorized eBay to cancel the contract.”


The specific wording indicates that members of the class must meet all five of the aforementioned criteria.


The factual basis:

The firm then alleges that Hasbro/Wizards of the Coast breached a “legally binding contract” with potential class members (people that meet the five requirements above) by cancelling confirmed eBay purchase orders for “War of the Spark: Mythic Edition” (hereinafter, “Mythic Edition”). He proposes that the, “legally binding contract” is executed the moment a buyer “clicked the ‘Buy It Now’ button.”


The alleged damages:

The firm alleges that potential class members suffered monetary loss due to eBay order cancellations of “Mythic Edition”; the potential class members, as buyers, were unable to find a replacement Mythic Edition for the same price, as the “fair market value” of the item had increased due to product-scarcity. He submits that potential class members, “…are entitled to recover damages in an amount equal to the fair market value of their purchase.”


What may be construed as legal advice to potential class members:

The firm states, “It is our position that affected users currently have a binding contract for the sale of War of the Spark: Mythic Edition. If Hasbro and Wizards breach the contract, you may be entitled to monetary damages. If you consent to the cancellation, the contract will no longer be binding and you will not be entitled to participate in this lawsuit as a class member or otherwise be able to pursue damages in an individual action.”


The alleged Cause of Action is only for “Breach of Contract”:

The firm states, “No. This lawsuit is about a breach of contract claim only.” This means they are not suing under any theory of Fraud (including Consumer Fraud). Additionally, they are not seeking any form of declaratory or injunctive relief. They do not want specific performance of the alleged broken contract.


Potential class members are solicited: 

 Lastly, the post includes a solicitation of potential class members. It states, “If you are interested in joining the lawsuit as a class representative and meet all of the criteria above, please send my litigation team an email at [emails are removed].”




Class actions, generally:

As the post is made on a public forum and solicits potential class members unrestrictive of geographic location, I assume the matter will proceed under federal jurisdiction. The potential action will have to exceed the jurisdictional amount of $75,000.00 in claimed damages.


Within federal jurisdiction, class action lawsuits are governed by Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Subsection (a) sets forth the prerequisites for class actions:


(a) Prerequisites. One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all members only if:

(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable;

(2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class;

(3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and

(4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.


Pursuant to FRCP Rule 23(c), a Class Action proceeds only after receiving class certification. In certifying a class action, the Court will appoint a class counsel. Class certification is not always provided, and if the class is not certified, the Court obviously does not appoint a class counsel.


The Rule also controls notice to potential class members. Per FRCP Rule 23(c)(2), “Notice” can be provided only to certified class, or upon an “ordering notice” under FRCP Rule 23(e)(1).


And, “The parties must provide the court with information sufficient to enable it to determine whether to give notice of the proposal to the class.” FRCP Rule 23(e)(1).


Breach of Contract requirements:

Generally, to be successful under a breach of contract theory, the following elements must be proved:


1.      The formation of a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant;

2.      Performance by the plaintiff;

3.      Failure of performance by the defendant; and

4.      Damages suffered by the plaintiff.


Ebay’s terms, conditions, and policies:

 Let’s take a look at the alleged contract terms, which are located on eBay’s website.


Firstly, eBay’s User Agreement states that anyone using the website agrees to all terms and policies, “The Mobile Application Terms of Use, all policies and additional terms posted on and in our sites, applications, tools, and services are incorporated into this User Agreement. You agree to comply with all terms of this User Agreement when accessing or using our Services.”


Further, eBay’s policy on cancelled transactions allows for sellers to unilaterally cancel sales, “Tip: You can cancel a transaction up to 30 days after a sale, even if your buyer has already paid.” Additionally, “What happens after you cancel a transaction: If you're a managed payments seller, or if the buyer paid using PayPal, a full refund will be issued automatically. If the buyer used another payment method, they will be asked to confirm that they received their refund before the cancellation is complete. Once the buyer has been refunded, you'll receive a final value fee credit. If you'd like, you can learn more about how refunds work.


Now let’s look at Hasbro’s eBay store policies. Same is not specific as to cancellations by the seller, nor is there any reference to non-performance of sales. However, it does state, “The availability of any item we sell is subject to change. Hasbro is not responsible for shipping delays as a result of mechanical failure and/or weather.


4. Conclusion

All buyers agreed to the terms, conditions, and policies of eBay, which specifically permit cancellation of an item by the seller. While the buyer may be entitled to a refund of the money spent, damages of the type alleged in the Reddit post are flimsy, at best.


Furthermore, the firm specifically states that it is only proceeding under a breach of contract theory. This means claims involving consumer fraud are not being sought, which is probably because the factual basis here doesn’t lend itself to a viable consumer fraud claim.


Additionally, the Reddit post may have been premature. If the action was filed the same day as the post was made, then it is doubtful the class received either a certification or an “ordering notice”. It’s also unclear whether the firm that made the post has been appointed its class counsel, especially since the post contains legal advice for prospective class members.


Ultimately, the above is just my take on this matter and we’ll have to wait to see any (if any) developments.


Disclaimer: The information in this document is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in his post should be construed as legal advice from CaptainJamoke (“CaptainJamoke” being inclusive, but without reference, to CaptainJamoke’s legal name) or the individual author, or is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction. CaptainJamoke is not affiliated with any of the individuals, companies, parties, or people referenced in this article. This article is purely opinion, and should not be construed to have any legal effect, binding, persuasive, or otherwise. 



About CaptainJamoke

Information relevant to readers regarding most my decks:

Since MTGA ranked seasons began I’ve hit mythic ranking consistently, often early into the month. All of my deck posts involving write-ups involve significant gameplay in ranked Bo1 and/or ranked Bo3. I tend to switch up the game mode depending on how much time I have to play MTGA, meaning that my decks are designed to work as listed in both Bo3 and Bo1 with zero changes to the main board. Currently, MTGA has 50-deck limit which can inhibit deck cloning if you are working in multiple decks at once   **Note -Since both formats have different metas, these decks can be modified for optimization if you stick with one format only. This doesn’t apply to decks posted for any tournament entries.**

My deck building process:

I will take a concept and put together an initial list. The deck is then played solely in ranked regardless of my current rank. I play until I lose a few and then modify the list to remove its weakest cards. I then repeat that process until I get bored with the deck. This process has gotten me to mythic every season except for one- I really tried to make bridgemaster affinity work but couldn’t figure out the right list. I ended up stuck in limbo between plat/diamond for the whole season. The most recent “core” deck concept we hit mythic was last season with GB Rock on 5/11/19.


I occasionally stream on Twitch and recently started trying to figure out YouTube- you can find me by searching “captainjamoke” on either. I’m also always hanging out in the Aetherhub discord if you want to discuss the deck lists.


Login to comment


Really good post, this is vital information on this kind of situations.
Thanks for your insight.
Get AetherHub Premium

Unlimited Private/Open decks, Favorite decks, Deck Folders, Collections and Binders! No ads, plus other benefits with the AetherHub Premium Account.

Read more about Premium

If you prefer to buy functions separately you can do so by purchasing NRG tokens.


Latest Articles

Budget Build Series - Bant & Sultai Flash
Arena Standard Deck 

20 Jul by MTG_Joe

Budget Build Series - I walk you through 3 budget variants of a themed deck, starting with only C & U cards and lead towards a fully tuned Tier Deck. Gameplay videos and tutorials provided as well!

Content Creator - Booster Therapy
Community Discussion 

19 Jul by Game-Jester

Booster Therapy - Content Creators make the MTG world go round. This series is to point out great creators, and people who are positive in the MTG Community.

*Updated 19th Jul.* Photos and information for the next MTG Set. We have a sneak peek at the new set from San Diego Comic-Con where Wizards are revealing the fall set.

Bus49mtg recently won AliasV's big Super Spiffy Tournament II using his own brew with Bant Ramp! Part of the Team Aether streaming team we got to sit down and talk to him about the deck, mtg, and life

Are you a Twitch or Youtube content creator? Do you need a place to put your decklists and content? And do you want some extra revenue from you decklists?

MTG Arena Codes
MTGA News 

18 Jul by BotherShawn

(Last updated July 12, 2019) Looking for a simple place to fill all of your Arena Code needs. This article will be continuously updated so bookmark it and check-in frequently.

First Competitive M20 Decklists
Competitive Decklists 

16 Jul by andreliverod

The first weekend after release is done and we have the first M20 tournament lists. A lot of diversity and exciting options for most archetypes.

How BotherShawn Hit Mythic Under $275
Arena Standard Competitive 

16 Jul by BotherShawn

Follow BotherShawn and his journey into hitting Mythic after only being on arena for three months and spending only $255. *results may vary*

New upgraded MTG Deckbuilders
AetherHub News 

12 Jul by andreliverod

Aetherhub's deckbuilding tools have recieved numerous upgrades over the last months. An MTG Arena deck builder and advanced searching have been added.

There has been a big variation of decks in decks going 5-0 published by Wizards in their latest meta post. We have gathered all 20 here for you to check out.

The Mastery pass is sparking a lot of controversy in the MTG Community. In this article, we will explore in detail what you really get and if it is really worth it to purchase the Mastery Pass.